Library / IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA [N THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON MONDAY, THE 5™ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA [N THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON MONDAY, THE 5™ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
Page 14 of 44
In response to paras] 13 - 15, the Plaintiffs are engaged in separate and distinct aspects of petroleum liquids operation. In further response to paras. 15.1 and 15.2, the Defendant denies issuing any storage license to any of the Plaintiffs or their affiliates. The li¢ense issued to the 24 Plaintiff and also Chisco Ltd which is used by the 1° Plaintiff are petroleum depot licenses, simpliciter, not storage licenses, and so doesnot permit the licensees to deploy stored products for their own.use, but to sell (Exh. A). It is not true that the Plaintiffs do not deal in, trade, sell or buy AGO. The i Plaintiff as a wholesale petroleum liquids supplier having transferred custody of its imported petroleum products to a storage facility has sold or is deemed to have sold the products to the storage facility as a wholesale customer, Specifically, when the 1‘ Plaintiff transfers its imported AGO into the storage facility of Chisco Ltd, it does so as a wholesale supplier, while Chisco Ltd . receives the product as a wholesale customer which deems such transaction as a sale and subject to be levied, likewise, the 2" Plaintiff's petroleum depot in _ Koko. The Plaintiffs sell petroleum products to telcos by including the costs of ' petroleum products amongst other related cost heads. Telcos requested a 40% : increase in call, SMS, and data costs due to escalating operational expenses in the country, which decision was driven by a 35% surge in operating expenses due to heightened energy costs (Exhs. A2), All. Telecommunication entities are mandated to secure storage licence for any base station with over 500 litres of petroleum products in line with the definition of a wholesale customer, of which the 2" Plaintiff has one (Exhs, A3, A4 and AS), The Plaintiffs by dealing with petroleum products in a commercial manner with a third party, qualify for levy. ‘The Plaintiffs are required to conduct these activities transparently and by so doing are obligated to submit transaction details to the Defendant. By their own admission in paragraphs 15.3 and 16, the Plaintiffs have failed to comply with JUDGEMENT IN JH9 (MIGERIA) LTD. & ANOR. v. THE NIG. MIDSTREAM & DOWNSTREAM PE TROLEUM REGULATORY AUTHOR: SUIT NO: FHC/ABI/CS/1480/2023
RegulationsPDF20242024-0214