Library / IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA [N THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON MONDAY, THE 5™ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA [N THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON MONDAY, THE 5™ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
Page 8 of 44
13. 14. 15. 16. An. Order striking down Regulation 5 (g) of the Operation Regulations for being unreasonable and outside the scope of the provisions of the PIA, An Order striking down Regulations 3 and 4 (1) of the PTS Regulations for being inconsistent with the legislative intent of PIA and the purpose and application of provisions of the PTS Regulations. “An Order restraining the Defendant either acting by itself or through any official or officer of the Defendant, or any agent or privy, or any governmental agency or law enforcement agency, or. any person by whatever designation, from further demanding from the Plaintiffs 0.5% of the wholesale price of its petroleum products and/or natural gas, or any amount at all as contribution to the Authority Fund and/or Midstream and Downstream infrastructure Gas Fund under the PIA (or in any form whatsoever), An Order restraining the Defendant either acting by itself or through any official or officer of the Defendant, or any agent or. privy, or any governmental agency, or any person by whatever designation, from. henceforth disrupting or threatening to disrupt or prevent the Plaintiffs from loading its petroleum products from their various depots on account on non-payment of 0.5% of the wholesale price of its petroleum products and/or natural gas or any other sum whatsoever, as contribution to the Authority Fund and Midstream and Downstream Infrastructure Gas Fund under the PIA (or-in any form whatsoever), JUDGEMENT IN JHS (NIGERIA) LTD. & ANOR. v, THE NIG, MIDS: TREAM & DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM REGULATE CYA AUTH Uo ary SUIT NO: FHC/ABJ/CS/1480/2023
RegulationsPDF20242024-028